<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Graph is Facebook&#8217;s Beacon Pivot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 05:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Email16</title>
		<link>http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Email16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erlebacher.org/?p=100#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Was desperately searching a way of adding the LIKE button on a tab of a facebook fan page. Check how the like button has been implemented on a facebook fan page at 
http://www.facebook.com/webwhispers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was desperately searching a way of adding the LIKE button on a tab of a facebook fan page. Check how the like button has been implemented on a facebook fan page at<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/webwhispers" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/webwhispers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Erlebacher</title>
		<link>http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Erlebacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erlebacher.org/?p=100#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Good points.  Re non-search ads, Google&#039;s &quot;&lt;a href&#039;&quot;http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/03/now-available-reach-right-audience.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search remarketing&lt;/a&gt;&quot; efforts are going to be huge for their display ad business.  My guess is that data provided by user-initiated searches are a better (and simpler) predictor of purchase intent than data provided by &quot;likes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.  Re non-search ads, Google&#39;s &#8220;<a href&#39;"http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/03/now-available-reach-right-audience.html" rel="nofollow">search remarketing</a>&#8221; efforts are going to be huge for their display ad business.  My guess is that data provided by user-initiated searches are a better (and simpler) predictor of purchase intent than data provided by &#8220;likes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Thornton</title>
		<link>http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erlebacher.org/?p=100#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I agree, and as long as they can solve the perceived and real privacy issues I could see them being bigger than Google in 5-10 years. (I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2010/05/08/confusing-a-public-with-the-public/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jeff Jarvis&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; did a good job addressing the perceived privacy issues.) The non-search advertising market is wide open, and between FB&#039;s Hunch-like knowledge of their users and their existing presence on 3rd-party sites via the API, it wouldn&#039;t be difficult to create a massive, highly targeted display ad platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, and as long as they can solve the perceived and real privacy issues I could see them being bigger than Google in 5-10 years. (I think <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2010/05/08/confusing-a-public-with-the-public/" rel="nofollow">Jeff Jarvis&#39;s post</a> did a good job addressing the perceived privacy issues.) The non-search advertising market is wide open, and between FB&#39;s Hunch-like knowledge of their users and their existing presence on 3rd-party sites via the API, it wouldn&#39;t be difficult to create a massive, highly targeted display ad platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Erlebacher</title>
		<link>http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Erlebacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erlebacher.org/?p=100#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Good points.  Re non-search ads, Google&#039;s &quot;&lt;a href&#039;&quot;http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/03/now-available-reach-right-audience.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search remarketing&lt;/a&gt;&quot; efforts are going to be huge for their display ad business.  My guess is that data provided by user-initiated searches are a better (and simpler) predictor of purchase intent than data provided by &quot;likes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.  Re non-search ads, Google&#39;s &#8220;<a href&#39;"http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/03/now-available-reach-right-audience.html" rel="nofollow">search remarketing</a>&#8221; efforts are going to be huge for their display ad business.  My guess is that data provided by user-initiated searches are a better (and simpler) predictor of purchase intent than data provided by &#8220;likes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Thornton</title>
		<link>http://erlebacher.org/2010/05/08/open-graph-is-facebooks-beacon-pivot/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 21:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://erlebacher.org/?p=100#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I agree, and as long as they can solve the perceived and real privacy issues I could see them being bigger than Google in 5-10 years. (I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2010/05/08/confusing-a-public-with-the-public/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jeff Jarvis&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; did a good job addressing the perceived privacy issues.) The non-search advertising market is wide open, and between FB&#039;s Hunch-like knowledge of their users and their existing presence on 3rd-party sites via the API, it wouldn&#039;t be difficult to create a massive, highly targeted display ad platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, and as long as they can solve the perceived and real privacy issues I could see them being bigger than Google in 5-10 years. (I think <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2010/05/08/confusing-a-public-with-the-public/" rel="nofollow">Jeff Jarvis&#39;s post</a> did a good job addressing the perceived privacy issues.) The non-search advertising market is wide open, and between FB&#39;s Hunch-like knowledge of their users and their existing presence on 3rd-party sites via the API, it wouldn&#39;t be difficult to create a massive, highly targeted display ad platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

